case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-09-24 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #3186 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3186 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Steven Universe]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Kushiel's Legacy and Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Gravity Falls]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Lacuna Coil]


__________________________________________________



06. [huge]
[Youtube Sam and Nia]


__________________________________________________



07. [huge]
[Austin Mahone]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Eddie Izzard]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Worm]


__________________________________________________



10. http://i.imgur.com/IOyJzu9.jpg
[Kristen Bell, House of Lies, OP warned for nudity]


__________________________________________________



11. http://i.imgur.com/zanEaAh.jpg
[The Great Mouse Detective, linked for porn (illustrated, furry)]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 014 secrets from Secret Submission Post #455.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is it prudish to not want to read/watch something because it has explicit sex?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-25 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
SA

^ Weird as in yes, avoiding something completely due to the existence of a sex scene as the *only* reason, is prudish

Nothing wrong with being prudish, read and watch what you like, but prudish it certainly is

Re: Is it prudish to not want to read/watch something because it has explicit sex?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-25 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Like the original anon you were replying to said, "prudish" is a negative descriptor to many people because it doesn't just imply strait-laced or proper, but (by the definition on the website you yourself linked elsewhere in the thread) excessively so, and usually is associated with snobby people who judge others for being irreverent or immodest. It's definitely a word that gets used as an insult.

Re: Is it prudish to not want to read/watch something because it has explicit sex?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-25 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I agree it's excessive like I said I think it's overkill

I would also think that squeeing hard and literally screaming in joy over a show that you OMG LOOOOVE is overkill

Am I going to go tell the squeeing person that? No

Luckily, other people's opinions on what's excessive or not mean nothing unless they try to stop you from doing it or impose their opinion on you out of the blue, and it's not like I'm giving this opinion unasked for since what other people think of this, is OP's entire question

Re: Is it prudish to not want to read/watch something because it has explicit sex?

(Anonymous) 2015-09-25 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
^ Thinking an action is overkill also =/= judging what kind of person the one performing the act of going overkill is

e.g. I think smoking is bad, I don't judge smokers