[ SECRET POST #3200 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3200 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 009 secrets from Secret Submission Post #457.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: y johnny cant read

[(Anonymous)]

No, I'd probably cringe at it, too. I know Twitter only allows for a certain amount of characters, but still...I would think educators would find a way to get their message out while still making it look professional. To say nothing of the fact that students will have a harder time taking educators seriously when they try and teach them proper writing skills ("If you can use netspeak, why can't I?").

And if they're trying to appear hip and cool? Then, yeah, that's always going to be bad no matter WHAT it is they're doing.

Re: y johnny cant read

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Proper writing skills include using the right mode, style, and voice for the medium, context, and audience.

But oh no, how dare we permit a shorthand!

Re: y johnny cant read

[(Anonymous)]

I have nothing wrong with shorthand techniques, and depending on the situation it could well be okay for teachers to use a bit of netspeak to communicate their message.

I just think on a general basis, it would look a little odd seeing educators type like that. But that's just me *Shrugs*.