Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #3202 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
Edit: Or actively harmful obviously. I realize I should probably make that distinction.
Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
Fictional characters (of age)? Even with the wrong sexuality for canon? Ehhh, it might be squicky as fuck depending on intent, but I don't think it's "wrong" per se. They're not real people (unless they are portraying someone who is... eh I dunno).
No one's too pure, basically. But don't put that shit in other people's faces unless they ask for it.
Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist
More trying to make the point that just the act of adding sex to something or putting your favorite characters in sexual situations doesn't automatically sully the source material somehow.
Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist