case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Everything deserves to have porn made of it, unless it's underage.

Edit: Or actively harmful obviously. I realize I should probably make that distinction.
Edited 2015-10-10 22:13 (UTC)
kitelovesyou: patsy (patsy)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] kitelovesyou 2015-10-10 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to admit I haven't thought a truckload about this, but I think when it's of actual people, much or most of the time, that shit isn't cool if posted publicly. Actively harmful I guess.

Fictional characters (of age)? Even with the wrong sexuality for canon? Ehhh, it might be squicky as fuck depending on intent, but I don't think it's "wrong" per se. They're not real people (unless they are portraying someone who is... eh I dunno).

No one's too pure, basically. But don't put that shit in other people's faces unless they ask for it.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2015-10-10 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, yeah. I'm not out there condoning something like ...say... showing off your RPF fic to actors at a convention. Like... dude. Highly uncool.

More trying to make the point that just the act of adding sex to something or putting your favorite characters in sexual situations doesn't automatically sully the source material somehow.
kitelovesyou: patsy (patsy)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] kitelovesyou 2015-10-10 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, for sure. "X character doesn't deserve porn" ...nahh. People's ids are weird.