[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I'll start: I saw some porn of Susan from discworld. This makes me profoundly uncomfortable. Surely there must be some women characters that do don't deserve this treatment? What are yours?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Totally disagree. Please bring on the Susan porn! And I'd very much like some Angua porn too.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Angua is different, she's very animalistic, very... physical. I can see her being DTF, but Susan? It just seems like finding out that mother Teresa had a sex dungeon and a gimp. Seems too... base and vile a thing for her.

Here you go

[insanenoodlyguy]

http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Susan_Sto_helit/1

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

You're really trying with the treating women as being a class that needs protecting by everyone thing today. It's like three threads already? Might want to cool it a little bit, save some for the rest of the week.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

WTF are you on about?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

SA, Is this a misfire?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Any character below the age of 15. Because yuck.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

I was going to type "Well that's a given" but then I remembered this is the internet. That makes me sad.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Make it 12, a lot of people at 13 and 14 are having sex.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

What is the precise nature of your objection here

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

It's Susan. She's not a particularly sexed or sexualised character which I admit is one of the things I love about her. Not that she's a prude, I just imagine she has better things to spend her energy on. I just don't like to see her portrayed as someone who spends her nights getting finger-blasted by her grandaddy.

Call it by it's proper name: Rule 34.

[insanenoodlyguy]

Rugrats. Not even the aged up versions from all grown up.


...
For once I'm going to do the right thing and NOT link you. But it's out there. And you can't unknow that.

Re: Call it by it's proper name: Rule 34.

[(Anonymous)]

I would hope no one's surprised by that. Disgusted, sure, but not surprised.

People shouldn't be sheltered about the internet for their own sake. :\

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[dethtoll]

Samus Aran.

It just feels wrong. I only felt stronger about that after the shitshow that was Other M.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[insanenoodlyguy]

Thanks to smash bro's, she's got a lot of crossover stuff too.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

i don't know why everyone is being so shitty to you. sex negative feminism is just as valid an option as sex positive feminism. it's not wrong to see sex in any way you choose. and it's not wrong to be uncomfortable seeing a fictional character who does not engage in a behaviour you find distasteful suddenly changing her character to suit fanboy wanking. i swear the sex positive brainwashing is un-fucking-believable.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Are there women who are so [insert positive description here] that everyone needs to pretend that they have nothing to do with icky, icky sex? Your question puzzles me. You don't have to enjoy all flavors of porn, but your query seems based on the idea that sex and sexuality sullies the subject. It doesn't.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[herpymcderp]

Everything deserves to have porn made of it, unless it's underage.

Edit: Or actively harmful obviously. I realize I should probably make that distinction.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Any RPS featuring underage people. I saw there was an explicit Andrew Lincoln/kid-who-plays-Carl fic while scrolling through a tag on AO3 yesterday, which just made me sad :(

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[forgottenjester]

If it's below a certain age comes to mind first. Then things that are harmful to others.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[feotakahari]

The obvious answer is that hentai manga about the green-eyed girl from the National Geographic cover. (Not linking. Find it yourself.)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Susan doesn't seem like the type who'd be at all interested in sex. Like, i can imagine her trying it once but quickly finding it a bore and reading a book to stay awake instead.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[(Anonymous)]

Off the top of my head the only thing that comes to mind is porn of notably underage characters. I'm not going to draw a hard line or anything, but I'd say fifteen is too young for anything E rated. And I'd go as far as to say I don't think it should be permitted on major public archives.

That said, I'm aware I can't hold actual teenagers to the same standards when it comes to what they read and write. If a thirteen-year-old writes something smutty about a thirteen-year-old character, that's probably a completely normal part of their own sexual development, and the idea of them being shamed for it is really upsetting. But I still would never knowingly read their fic myself, and I'm pretty uncomfortable with the idea of other adults knowingly reading it.

I'm also pretty leery about slave/master porn, especially if it's overtly coercive or forceful. (I mean, it's rape no matter what, but personally I think the distinction between rape by default and forcible rape still has some validity.) I'm not sure I'd say it shouldn't be permitted on major public archives, but I do wish people wouldn't post it on major public archives.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[otakugal15]

Most disney characters, especially the female ones. Though certain disney ladies I'm fine reading smut about.