case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-10 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3202 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] feotakahari 2015-10-10 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
The obvious answer is that hentai manga about the green-eyed girl from the National Geographic cover. (Not linking. Find it yourself.)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-10 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, there goes what was left of my faith in humanity.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
You don't get to post in this fucking thread

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Why.....not?

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think the goddamn bronies have a lot of authority in regards to discussion of sexualizing characters. Not a ton of ground to stand on there.

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Oh yeaaah because one person is responsible for the behavior of their entire fandom.

To my knowledge Feo themselves have not done any of the things you're accusing them of. Unless that's not true, they have as much right as anyone else to speak on this.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

Re: Porn fanworks of certain characters that should not exist

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-10-11 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Even if they draw the porn themselves, that changes nothing.