[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

There are real women who aren't into sex for whatever reason. But they're not into sex because they're not into it, not because sex is somehow beneath them, which is what the OP is implying.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Op implies no such thing. You militantly sex-positive freaks are projecting way too hard.

Re: nayrt

[herpymcderp]

Stating that porn shouldn't exist of a certain female character really does imply that there's something "wrong" with a sexual depiction because said character is female.

I mean, OP never mentioned any male characters here.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

"militantly sex-positive freaks"

Hi OP. I think its that weird hostility about anything but your opinions about sex that are making it obvious.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

OP does. What else do you think they mean by "don't deserve this treatment", i.e. to be thought of as a sexual being? It's not militantly positive to suggest that sexuality and sex isn't a negative trait, but the fact that you describe as such says a great deal about you.