[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Actually, I think the character OP is talking about canonically dislikes anything having to do with icky, icky sex? And there are real women like that too, you don't have to pretend.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Nayrt but that's very much OP's interpretation of the character

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

The OP thinks that Susan has better things to do than have sex. I do not recall any actual support for this in canon, though. To me it sounds like the OP's interpretation, which is fine. But they don't get to claim that their interpretation is canon or that everyone else should follow their interpretation.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

There are real women who aren't into sex for whatever reason. But they're not into sex because they're not into it, not because sex is somehow beneath them, which is what the OP is implying.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Op implies no such thing. You militantly sex-positive freaks are projecting way too hard.

Re: nayrt

[herpymcderp]

Stating that porn shouldn't exist of a certain female character really does imply that there's something "wrong" with a sexual depiction because said character is female.

I mean, OP never mentioned any male characters here.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

"militantly sex-positive freaks"

Hi OP. I think its that weird hostility about anything but your opinions about sex that are making it obvious.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

OP does. What else do you think they mean by "don't deserve this treatment", i.e. to be thought of as a sexual being? It's not militantly positive to suggest that sexuality and sex isn't a negative trait, but the fact that you describe as such says a great deal about you.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's important to clarify that CANON has never mentioned that Susan doesn't like or want sex. CANON hasn't said anything of the kind. It's the OP who's portraying Susan as someone who isn't interested in sex and trying to claim their headcanon is canon. I assume there aren't many Discworld fans here, otherwise more people would be calling them on their BS.