[ SECRET POST #3202 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3202 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: TW: Rape

[(Anonymous)]

DA

No, it's not, because his intention was not to rape. A lot of people think that spouse = willing sex anytime, but that doesn't mean they think "Hey, I can rape someone legally!"

Re: TW: Rape

[kitelovesyou]

What is intentional or not gets fuzzy here, because of ignorance. Wilful ignorance in this day and age. Someone ignored their sexual partner's "NO" and fucked them anyway? How could it get to that stage where they could ignore a "NO" and still think that wasn't rape? Fucked up ideas about marriage, women, men, sex.

Re: TW: Rape

[(Anonymous)]

He intended to perform an action. That action was rape (whether or not he identified it as such). Therfore he intended to rape.

The important point about rape is not whether or not someone is trying to rape qua rape.

Re: TW: Rape

[(Anonymous)]

nonsense, most rapists justify their actions, that doesn't make it unintentional rape, it just means they're prioritizing their own wants over the consent of someone else, reckless rape not unintentional rape