Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-11 03:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #3203 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3203 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question thread!
I mean, it's a valid theory, but it's not "scientific evidence" and will never be.
Re: Question thread!
(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Question thread!
Re: Question thread!
(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)Basically, the jury's still out on whether the Universe will simply lose inertia and remain that way, or whether it will shrink back into itself (the Big Crunch).
Re: Question thread!
(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)There's also multiverse theories, with the suggestion that if existence is infinite, then surely infinite Big Bangs have room to happen.
But it's not really "evident" per se (besides suggestion that the speed of the Universe's expansion could slow), but it is very logical theorizing.
Re: Question thread!
(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)Using what precedent?