case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-11 03:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #3203 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3203 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Question thread!

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Several big name astrophysicists have suggested the possibility of the Big Bang ending in a "Big Crunch" of sort, and it does follow logic that what begins must end, and will likely begin again.

There's also multiverse theories, with the suggestion that if existence is infinite, then surely infinite Big Bangs have room to happen.

But it's not really "evident" per se (besides suggestion that the speed of the Universe's expansion could slow), but it is very logical theorizing.

Re: Question thread!

(Anonymous) 2015-10-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
it does follow logic that what begins must end, and will likely begin again

Using what precedent?