Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-15 06:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #3207 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3207 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #458.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 01:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 01:08 am (UTC)(link)I can't speak for the OP, but for me it's fandom's double standard when a woman is the one who behaves abusively in a relationship.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 02:26 am (UTC)(link)I don't know, I just find someone assuming the worst about their love interest and then attacking them with a lethal weapon out of jealousy and anger to be very off-putting. I also know that had Steve been the one behaving like that, he probably would have been soundly condemned for it by fandom.
That scene just made me think Peggy was too immature to be in a relationship with anyone.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-16 04:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-16 13:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-16 14:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 01:47 am (UTC)(link)I really don't have a rational objection. That's why I'm not trying to make a rational point.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)Can anyone tell me if this is true/translated properly?
http://youneedtostrut.tumblr.com/post/131229962800/cookieseb-chinese-publication-modern-weekly
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Something I don't get is
(Anonymous) 2015-10-15 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Something I don't get is
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 12:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 04:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)-- another fan of Bucky&Peggy fic
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)We should start a Bucky/Peggy support group. All two of us.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)Actually, you know what this situation calls for? A fic fest. A TFA-centric fic fest. (Perhaps with the requirement that a minimum of, say, 75% of a submitted fic's word count has to be set in the '40s, to give authors a little flexibility.)
I'm not even going to think about getting a fest up and running before people (myself included) have gotten over their Yuletide hangovers, but early-ish next year could be an excellent time for it, when everyone's gearing up for CA:CW.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-10-17 03:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-16 04:22 am (UTC)(link)