[ SECRET POST #3212 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3212 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #459.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think the difference for me is that fan artists very rarely do anything that is other than interpretive of an IP where a fan writer might do a work that is canon compliant enough that original creators won't look at their work lest they be accused of ripping off the fan.

Does that make sense? (I'm tired.)

[(Anonymous)]

I think there are a lot of Disney fanartists who don't fit into that category, because often their work IS "canon compliant" enough where it's not really an interpretation.