case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-23 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #3215 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3215 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Disney's Descendants]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________







04. [SPOILERS for Undertale]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Ancillary Mercy]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Great British Bake Off, series 6]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Defiance]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for shepherd's crown]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for abuse]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #459.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
"Unwatchable" is wholly subjective but OP treats it as fact -- something I've seen peopme figuratively tarred and feathered for here. But it's popular to hate on SPN so I won't be surprised if no one does it here.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
they don't treat it as fact

it's clearly - in context - being used as a subjective expression of one person's opinion

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
And again I say, were this about something generally loved and not something that's cool to hate, people would crawl up your ass and say your comment is not about context but about creating "personal facts/truth."

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
da

How is it 'cool to hate'? People don't like this show because it has bad writing, bad production values, and bad acting. All legitimate reasons to dislike something. In my opinion.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a difference between dislike and hate. Dislike is not liking something for a variety of reasons that may or may not have basis on quality. Hating it is then taking your dislike and and being a dickwaffle about for asspats and funsies.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
So it's fine if we don't like something, as long as we don't ever talk about not liking it?

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
You are being adorably deliberately obtuse. Because I refuse to believe you don't know the difference between talking about something and hating on it.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Well, for starters the term 'hating on' is such a dreadful, childish fad that I will be glad to see the back of. But maybe I really don't know the difference between talking about something and hating on it, because it seems to me that expressing dissatisfaction about a show that someone else enjoys is automatically 'hating on'.

And if we can't express ourselves on fandom secrets then we are all surely doomed.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
log off grandma

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
DA. I rather think it's you who need to log off. Then grow up.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
That...isn't actually what hating something is, anymore than loving something means doing things for asspats and funsies.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right. I should have clarified "hating ON something" versus disliking (or even hating) it."

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
It has *awesome* production values. The Men-of-Letters set alone is worth the price of admission.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Literally everyone presents their opinion as fact here, and literally no one gets away with calling them on it. It's how this shit works.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
There's some amazing Good Omens wank from here that disproves your comment.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Link?

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I won't be in a position to find it for about 6 hours. I'll do it then if nobody else has taken up the arduous task of googling something.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-23 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
So you're mocking other people for not googling something while making the excuse that you're in no position to google something.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
19 hours later, failed to deliver.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
DA. Oh for gods' sake, you seem to be the same juvenile and desperate SPN stan above who is incapable of accepting that anyone can hold a different view point to you and wants to pick a fight about it. Nothing about this person's original comment showed any mockery - they just referred to a contradicting view point.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-25 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Actually not a fan, but nice try!

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
My secret got put into not!secret recently because I didn't put "I think" at the start :( I was told I made it sound more like fact than my opinion.

Re: fixed that for you

(Anonymous) 2015-10-24 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly!