[ SECRET POST #3217 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3217 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I disagree. From a plot perspective and a story-telling perspective I could nitpick the plots and narratives of the original trilogy as easily as the prequels. I don't, because I like all the films and all films are flawed. But I could. In my opinion, the prequels actually have a more interesting story than the original trilogy.

This is the point where I'm pretty sure we have actually argued this before (assuming you're the same prequel!anon) so it's probably no point in going over it again.

No one is "wrong" -- we just have different likes and dislikes. Different opinions.

I have no problems with you liking the prequels. I'm just saying that like all films, they're flawed, and they're flawed in certain specific ways that the original films aren't. Obviously that's just an opinion - everything I say is an opinion, I'm not some kind of correct-movie-assertion robot created by God - but I think it's true.

[(Anonymous)]

"Obviously that's just an opinion - everything I say is an opinion, I'm not some kind of correct-movie-assertion robot created by God - but I think it's true."

I understand that. But keep in mind if you say something like this:

"I am capable of recognizing when I feel I dislike something in a movie on grounds of taste, and when I am criticizing a specific thing that exists on screen for the role it plays in the film as a work."

"I just think that, to the extent that it is objective, a lot of the criticism is valid IMO."
(I'm presuming this is you? If not, I apologize.)

It sounds as though you're saying that your criticisms ARE objective.

I'm saying that it's fine to criticize or dislike something, but just because you identified things that you think are flawed in the prequels doesn't mean other will agree or that those flaws are objectively there for everyone.

[(Anonymous)]

Both of those things are - in my mind - opinions. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough in my phrasing, I have a cold so I'm probably not thinking of things clearly as much as I usually would. Objective is probably not the word that I want to go with.