Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-25 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #3217 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3217 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-25 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)I understand that. But keep in mind if you say something like this:
"I am capable of recognizing when I feel I dislike something in a movie on grounds of taste, and when I am criticizing a specific thing that exists on screen for the role it plays in the film as a work."
"I just think that, to the extent that it is objective, a lot of the criticism is valid IMO."
(I'm presuming this is you? If not, I apologize.)
It sounds as though you're saying that your criticisms ARE objective.
I'm saying that it's fine to criticize or dislike something, but just because you identified things that you think are flawed in the prequels doesn't mean other will agree or that those flaws are objectively there for everyone.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-25 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)