case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-10-28 05:41 pm

[ SECRET POST #3220 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3220 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #460.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-10-28 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I will say, regardless of the inaccuracies, it boggles the mind that no one involved with the film saw this attack coming. They should have had several historians on the payroll to back up the film's assertions. I think if they had come out with a strong defense of "yes, we might have changed some things around, but see this speech and this legislative comment and this letter showing that he felt this way", the controversy would have died down very quickly.