Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-10-31 03:24 pm
[ SECRET POST #3223 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3223 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)https://www.google.com/search?q=phene+thyla.&oq=phene+thyla.&aqs=chrome..69i57.389j0j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8#q=phene+thyla
Which leads me to this: http://phene-thyla-mine.tumblr.com/
Which has a latest post from: December 14, 2014
Which is almost a year ago...
If you're pissed at what's there go ahead and reblog.
Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)point 6:
"Anonymous comments on secret posts are allowed - as long as they don't randomly become personal attacks. IP addresses will not (usually) be logged, but comments and threads containing random personal attacks or wank can and will be deleted or frozen without warning. Secrets wise: If you make a secret saying that Harry Potter fans annoy you, that's fine. If you make one naming a specific author in Harry Potter fandom and ripping into her as a person, that is not fine."
"If you're pissed at what's there go ahead and reblog."
I could suggest you to do the same with the people you keep mentioning too, instead of cowardly complain about them only where you think they won't read.
Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)If you're talking about Lucy the Beatles' fan comment, that's a little more interesting. Because that's actually in reference to two separate Spuhura fans (one defending John Lennon, the other who has a reference to one of their songs). But it was more of a catch-all reference for the butthurt people in that fandom.
As for reblogging - Nah. I "complained" here because you felt the need to inject Trek ship wank into a Star Wars secret.
I really do find it funny how upset you are at my replies. You keep engaging! As though I don't have a right to post here and challenge the things you're saying. It really is amusing.
Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: last time, wouldn't want you to say I can't let it go..
(Anonymous) 2015-11-04 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)It really is amusing how arrogant you are. You're lambasting me for breaking the rules but you broke them yourself so you clearly don't care about them at all.
And I'm hardly going to feel deep regret for talking shit about jean008, I hate to inform you. (Actually, no, I don't hate having to inform you of that. I take great joy in it, given what an awful person jean008 is).
As for the Lucy and Beatles fan comment - I hope you realize that it's almost impossible for anyone to have a username come up from googling the information I provided. And that it was referencing two separate people.
If you're regretting not going to the mods earlier, well, that's your problem.
You know no one was forcing you to engage with me, right? I mean, I'm having a blast but you seem to feel that it's immature/bad/pathetic to continue this conversation. So I wonder at your behavior. And laugh at it, I'll admit.