[ SECRET POST #3228 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3228 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

Conversely I find the immediate rejection of any form of doctrine a bit annoying. Doctrine is something an individual has to assess for themselves and decide whether they agree or not, not something to be peer-pressured into rejecting.

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[(Anonymous)]

I guess it depends what you mean by doctrine? If you mean religious texts that are anything more than philosophy (so are about actual mythology/supernatural events/etc) I'm not interested. I respect people who are interested in it, but I just don't see the need for me personally.

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com]

By doctrine, I mean the set of "rules" a given denomination of a religion has chosen. Sure, some of those are the mythology, but some are more philosophical. I think it's short-sighted to reject them just because they're "The Rules" without examining them first to determine which they are, and if the philosophical ones have relevance.