[ SECRET POST #3228 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3228 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #461.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[(Anonymous)]

It costs me time and effort, which is not inconsiderable when you look at the long list of potential triggers people want to be warned for. Even if I'm willing to consider the obvious ones, there'll always be another person with a trigger you've never even heard of. Am I allowed to draw a line, or is it my responsibility to try and warn for every single thing that might trigger someone?

My argument is that no, it's not my responsibility. It'd be nice if I warned, and I'd be helping people out... but it's my choice. Just like if I decided that not being around cell phones helped my mental condition, so every person I encountered in public isn't allowed to use their cell phone when I'm around. I don't get to ask that, and people aren't awful for telling me no.

Re: Arguments or criticisms you hate

[(Anonymous)]

Typing up a warning seems like a far lighter burden than being barred from accessing your phone whenever you're in the presence of a particular stranger...