case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-10 06:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #3233 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3233 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-11 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I do hate when a character is given a pregnancy storyline out of the blue because the actor is pregnant. I would much, much rather the creators just do their best to disguise the bump and we all just pretend it's not there until the actress gives birth.

Giving a character a baby when it wasn't in the original plan for the story is a narrative decision that forever shapes the character and the story you're telling. I feel like a lot of writers don't really realize what a huge chunk of narrative structure they are dropping abruptly into their story and forcing the story to accommodate. (Can you imagine if Scully had a baby in S2 of The X-Files, rather than being briefly abducted? *shudders*)

By comparison, simply asking your audience to put their baby bump blinders on for a few episodes is such a minor thing that I don't understand why the writers would ever choose the former option.

But I do feel like you're hugely underestimating the cost of that kind of complicated CGI work, OP. I don't think using CGI to disguise a pregnancy is something that's particularly doable yet, in a budgetary sense.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-11 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
I especially hate it when said baby storyline turns into a contrived plotline they do away with, like the writers realized "you know what, nevermind baby."

Although I think it happens in general with baby plotlines, not just the actress being pregnant. Look at 30 Rock - they gave Jack a baby, made him all about being a dad, then got tired of it and... actually, I forget what happened.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-11 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
yeah i agree. just use close ups for the season.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-11 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
It was funny, because she looked super pregnant but they hid it as well as they could (big coats, most of her job early in the season was as a medical examiner so she was always behind a desk or morgue table, and then in the trunk of a car!) but when the character was pregnant in season 8, Gillian Anderson didn't look the slightest bit like she had looked when actually pregnant!