case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-11 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3234 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3234 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Golden Girls]


__________________________________________________



02.
[Boku no Hero Academia]


__________________________________________________



03.
[C.S. Lewis vs. J.R.R. Tolkien]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Pokémon, Leah Remini]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Man In The High Castle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Marjorie Liu, Sana Takeda, Monstress]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 2 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-11 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say i can't stand him, but while I loved his stuff as a kid I don't anymore. I don't like his writing style at all and his hamfisted allegory doesn't work for me (I feel the same way about Pullman, I only like author tract stuff when it is subtle and woven into the world rather than slammed in reader's faces).

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
Pullman's author tract stuff bothers me as much as it does with Lewis, but I think he's more enjoyable purely as a writer once you set that aside.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-12 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with that. I liked Pullman's first two books quite a bit. It was just the third one that became more about author tract than telling the story. Lewis's books are clearly for children and while I enjoyed them when I was in the right age group, once I grew up and tried to reread them there was just no substance there. No character, no depth, nothing but allegory and a rather boring, half-assed worldbuilding.
sarillia: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-11-12 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
It's kind of weird to see you say that his books are for kids since I'm more familiar with his religious and other non-fiction writings than his fiction. Although my favorite thing he wrote is The Screwtape Letters.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Personally, I've read both his children's fiction and his other work & I'm equally annoyed by both.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-11-12 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
I meant Narnia specifically. But even in his other stuff the writing style is very child-like to me. Even when the subject is more adult, the writing style is still more the style for childrens books.

Re: Controversial Opinions

(Anonymous) 2015-11-12 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Really? IDK about Lewis's other writings for adults, but I would never describe his Space Trilogy as child-like. Quite the opposite, in fact; I found it rather dry, almost to the point of reading like a textbook in some parts. (The second half of Perelandra is especially guilty of this.)
ext_18500: My non-fandom OC Oraania. She's crazy. (Default)

Re: Controversial Opinions

[identity profile] mimi-sardinia.livejournal.com 2015-11-12 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if I would go as far as to say I cannot stand reading Narnia anymore, but I did have a similar experience as you when I read it again, around when the Disney LWW movie came out. That was also around the time I read The Hobbit, so I had the comparision of two writers well-known for being friends.

I also feel, especially when compared to The Hobbit, that Narnia comes over rather condescending.