case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-12 07:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #3235 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3235 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-13 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Not necessarily.

It's not like they're trying to impress anyone they're just exploring what the character could look like.

It's a crutch to what? ~originality~?

Fanart is for fun. It's one thing to say it gives you a certain reaction but your statement is subjective. It comes off like "you're doing fanart wroooooooooooong"

(Anonymous) 2015-11-13 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
I got no problem with artists genuinely reinterpreting silhouettes or other significant features for human-shaped versions of a character. But for purposes of getting off, why why WHY draw Generic Hawt Anime Girl/Guy versions of a character you like so that the genitals "fit together" better?