[ SECRET POST #3236 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3236 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Video Games, The Last Of Us]


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Akagami no Shirayukihime]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nameless ~The one thing you must recall~]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
(The Librarians, Cassandra Cillian)


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Room (2015)]




__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Hemlock Grove seasons 2 & 3]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for incest]

[Game of Thrones]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #462.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

I think the author could have helped this a lot of they had put in just a couple lines mentioning that "now of course, this wouldn't fit every single household, due to disability and other issues." It's a good thing to acknowledge and wouldn't take up much room.

But I don't think it needs a full-blown analysis of how it would be different for other types of households, because the article's obviously aimed at the "typical" heterosexual household and honestly, articles like this NEED to be short and focused enough to be actually readable in a reasonable length of time, instead of being a long multi-part analytical essay.

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

They did say that not all of these can apply to every situation, although they didn't mention disability as a specific reason it might not.

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

DA. Yeah, this. It was totally mentioned that not all things would be applied to everyone. Like, that was said before the list even got started.

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

"This list entails suggestions for some practical tools all men can apply in their day-to-day lives to foster equality in their relationships with women"

Actual quote, directly copypasted.

Sounds like the author's talking out of both sides of their mouth.

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

DA.

Another direct quote:

"The list is not intended to be exhaustive or exclusive. Certain items on the list will apply to some men more than others, but if you are a man and a human I guarantee there is at least one area on the list where you could make an improvement."

I don't think the author is wrong to say ONE THING is likely going to apply to any man who is going to read it.

Re: Is this reasonable, or have I gone full-out SJW?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know why the author would need to mention that at all. Surely anyone with any level of reading comprehension should be able to come to that conclusion on their own. I mean, come on.