[ SECRET POST #3237 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT but generally, a straight woman can't fetishize a heterosexual relationship because heterosexuality isn't a fetish for her. A gay man can't fetishize gay relationships because gay attraction isn't a fetish for him, but it is for straight women.

[kallanda_lee]

You realize that technically sex of any kind can't, by definition, be a fetish, right?

A fetish is specifically something normally non-sexual that gets turned sexual in our brain (like certain clothes, or spanking, or whatever).

But sexual characteristics (genitals, breasts, secondary sexual characteristics) and the act of sex (by one, two of more people) are never actual fetishes, because it's *normal* for humans to be aroused by sex - yes, even sex that does not correlate with their sexual orientation.

I mean, I know fandom and sj circles love the word, but it's just plain wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

SJ circles say breasts are a fetish too. They're not sexual, they've just been sexualized so widely that we think they're sexual. Breasts are for feeding babies. Enlightened non-Euro cultures that don't have breast taboos think you're a baby if you like breasts, lol!

[(Anonymous)]

What do you mean "sj circles"? This actually has some merit.

[(Anonymous)]

Only SJ circles say it that way. To discuss the merit in it, you have to accommodate the difference between breasts and other fetishes, which is that they're a fetish taught to everyone by society, not a random thing to be inexplicably aroused by. SJs don't do that, instead pretending that everyone who likes breasts is a freak (and a straight man, because remembering lesbians and bi girls/guys creates the paradox of an oppressed group being problematic about something)

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, horseshit. My breasts are certainly sexual. I feel sorry for any woman whose aren't.