[ SECRET POST #3238 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3238 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Writers: World-building and character designing

[tabaqui]

And to me, it's because it's a dragon in a cornfield, when there is nothing else remotely *like* a dragon in a cornfield anywhere else.

So, however we arrive at it, we both arrive at the same conclusion. Dragons in Bilbo's cornfield (which, i know, he didn't have) do not work.

:)

Re: Writers: World-building and character designing

[(Anonymous)]

Well, but the reason it doesn't work is important when it comes to judging other instances of things.

For instance, take a knight in armor swimming through a river. To me, that's only wrong if it doesn't make sense tonally for the story - so if, making up an example completely hypothetically, you were writing some kind of heroic fairy-tale-esque romance drawing on things like the chansons and chivalric fable, perhaps that makes sense tonally. So that's where there is a difference.