[ SECRET POST #3243 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3243 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Longmire]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Arrow]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for dub-con/non-con]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for rape]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #463.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

The easy way isn't always the right way.

Congratulations, you're lazy. and you're probably misinforming people in your laziness.

[(Anonymous)]

DA. But he still is autistic and can be used as an example for cognitive state, even if he isn't a nice person.

[(Anonymous)]

True, but he shouldn't be used as an example of "being autistic will make you like this" or even "loads of autistic people are like this"

There are a lot of things in his life aside autism that contribute to the way he is, including abusive or negligent parents.

If you're going to talk about Chris Can's case specifically consider all the unique factors not just those that fit your current argument.

[(Anonymous)]

I feel like we are having two different conversations. The original anon did not claim that "being autistic will make you like this" or even that "loads of autistic people are like this".

They only used Chris Chan as an example of a person who might be able to consent to some things, but not understand others:
at the Chris Chan level where the concept of informed consent is understood but the full benefits of a cure and downsides of the condition might not be

I understand that you might not like to be grouped with Chris Chan at all, but in this case he was a valid, demonstrative example.