[ SECRET POST #3245 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3245 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: (TW Rape) On the subject of Boycotting dead authors...

[(Anonymous)]

I think it would depend on how you see the movie and how is estate his set up. IMO the purpose of boycotting something is not to give them money. So if you wanted to pirate it, he makes no money off that, nor does his estate. (Full disclosure: idk if Polanski has an estate or anything like that, this is all hypothetical. I don't know anything about his movies either.)

Also, how much does his art correlate to his crimes? If a work by a known child molestor glorified age gaps or under age relationships or anything that could be interpreted as "pleading his case" if you will, I would be more uncomfortable watching it, but if the artist was not making any money and I knew about its unethical rhetoric/implications going in, I still might be able to deal.