case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-23 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #3246 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3246 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [tb]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-11-24 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I just wish fiction would sometimes acknowledge that conflict-free abortion is a reality for some women.

Sure, sometimes it is. For a lot of people, there are negative associations from it. I did a fair amount of research on how women felt after having one, and at least from what I saw, there's a noticeable if not surprising correlation between the attitudes of one's family/lover about the abortion, and how the women felt about it. The ones that were pressured into it, or guilted over it, had to keep it a secret, or knew those close to them don't approve, were far more likely to regret it or to report traumatized feelings over it.

In other words, if you want a conflict-free abortion for a character, you can't just decide to write one, if you want it to be realistic and IC. You have to consider the relationships and circumstances of the character.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
if you want a conflict-free abortion for a character, you can't just decide to write one, if you want it to be realistic and IC. You have to consider the relationships and circumstances of the character.

Fair enough. I mean, if you want it to be extremely in character. But then I'm in a big enough fandom that characterization is a very malleable, amorphous thing anyway. One of the main characters in my OTP is someone who, as I see it, would never want kids. Yet people feel no reticence about writing him as someone who can't wait, not just to have kids, but to bear them himself (which is yet more OOC). And for that matter, how many female characters in popular media choose to keep their baby, because the writers want a baby story line, when it would probably be more in line with their character for them to have an abortion?

So yeah, the whole "realism and characterization" argument cuts both ways. Myself, I tend to not be overly hung up on it. If the writer can make me want to keep reading, then it's all good. I think that's how most fic readers are.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Someone I know had one. It was very much "birth controlled failed, well, shit. Now it's a hassle." and her biggest complaint was the waiting room and recovery area had next to zero entertainment available. So her next paycheck she got a stack of magazines and some cheap DVDs and donated them to the clinic so others wouldn't be stuck achy and bored waiting to be able to go home. I thought that was awesome.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 08:14 am (UTC)(link)
That is awesome. Your friend is awesome. This comment literally made my day, I'm not even kidding. If I knew how to forge metal I would make your friend a trophy for winning at life.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
She seems like a callous person. Could she not even mourn for the life inside her that died for five minutes?

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I assume that if she saw it this way, she wouldn't have an abortion in the first place.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
There's lots of things living inside the human body that we kill as soon as we can without being expected to mourn them. If she didn't want a human being growing inside her, why would she mourn it?

(Anonymous) 2015-11-25 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Can you eat steak without mourning for the cow that gave it's innocent life for you? Some people are really upset and horrified by the idea of killing animals to eat them, and lots of aren't aren't. Some people even want it outlawed for religious reasons.

For lots of people getting a fetus removed is no more emotionally bothersome than preventing it in the first place with a condom, and some religions forbid even condoms because if God doesn't want you to have a baby he'll prevent it somehow so if you get pregnant it's God's will.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
And she didn't think she was killing a person? That seems odd somehow.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Not sure if you're trolling, but a lot of people don't actually consider a fetus that's not even remotely capable of life outside the mother's body a person.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-24 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you anti-choice?