[ SECRET POST #3247 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3247 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Writing tips

[(Anonymous)]

Also I'd like to add to this for people who use Sue litmus tests. Remember those things can be subjective depending on the opinions of the creator.

For example- On the Universal Mary Sue Litmus Test, choosing a name you would give a child gets you 10 points. Making your character a "cosmic keystone" (meaning their existence is tied to the existence or balance of the world) gets you 2 points.

Slightly OT

[feotakahari]

If that's the test I'm thinking of, I remember being frustrated at how harshly it grades succubi and incubi. A lot of things that would be natural for that sort of character earn a high score.

Re: Slightly OT

[(Anonymous)]

Yep.

Seducing characters and making them love the character may be "sueish" for regular characters but...that's kind of part of the job description.

SA

[(Anonymous)]

Part of the job description for succubi and incubi that is

Re: Slightly OT

[dani_phantasma]

That reminds me of a huge annoyance I have in general with Sue tests. Arbitrary point spiking for things that the creator thinks just CANNOT be done right and don't even try.

I still remember a test that considered relation to canon characters a trait worthy of "hand in your test, insta-sue" Like I have seen several awesome OCs that were related to a canon out of plot necessity or means of introduction.

(also isn't that the way shows and canons do it all the time? Like I can think of several one episode characters in MLP that were introduced through someone else and they're fine.)

Re: Slightly OT

[(Anonymous)]

You are just pissed because literally every single one of your characters is off the scale on the Sue-o-meter.