case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-11-27 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #3250 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[rhett and link]


__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/HFa7mmA.gif
[moving gif]


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/GzJRfyl.gif
[moving gif]


__________________________________________________



04. http://i.imgur.com/cCPmEkC.jpg
[linked for porn / het / illustrated]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Re: Battlestar Galactica Finale]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games/Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones]



__________________________________________________



12. [tb2]


__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape]




__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for mentions of terror attacks]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, regardless of the correctness or incorrectness of the original post, that is an unprofessional response.

Both things can be wrong.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

That's what I thought...

When you look for advice about becoming a published author, one of the things that gets drilled into your head is "Don't respond to reviews, especially negative reviews, it makes YOU look bad." People like Anne Rice and Laurel K. Hamilton are held up as examples of how NOT to deal with the critics.

This incident, to me, is reminiscent of the sort of outbursts Rice would have when she got a 1-star rating on Amazon or whatever.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
DA

I wonder if agents shouldn't include a spiel about social media in their contracts? Because while I hate to be the "everyone turns evil online" person, since I think that tends to be exaggerated, I DO think that people react impulsively and forget that what happens online will impact how people see you in the "real" world. Unless of course you're anonymous, but a writer won't be, and I get that. But then watch what you say. You know? It really shouldn't be rocket science.

I know sometimes what I do is type up what I want to say, then wait until the anger cools off. Then I go back and decide whether or not it's really a good idea to post. 9/10? Nope. Not a good idea.