Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-11-27 06:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #3250 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3250 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

[rhett and link]
__________________________________________________
02. http://i.imgur.com/HFa7mmA.gif
[moving gif]
__________________________________________________
03. http://i.imgur.com/GzJRfyl.gif
[moving gif]
__________________________________________________
04. http://i.imgur.com/cCPmEkC.jpg
[linked for porn / het / illustrated]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Re: Battlestar Galactica Finale]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games/Mockingjay]

__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones]

__________________________________________________
12. [tb2]
__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
14. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
15. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
16. [WARNING for mentions of terror attacks]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:23 am (UTC)(link)So, here’s a thing, which I somewhat agree with in some parts and strongly disagree with in others:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nightvale/comments/3ubepr/spoilers_my_issue_with_the_novel/
And here’s the response to the thing, which strikes me as kind of weird and unprofessional, but maybe I’m overreacting:
https://twitter.com/PlanetofFinks/status/669932702381027330
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:27 am (UTC)(link)Both things can be wrong.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:43 am (UTC)(link)That's what I thought...
When you look for advice about becoming a published author, one of the things that gets drilled into your head is "Don't respond to reviews, especially negative reviews, it makes YOU look bad." People like Anne Rice and Laurel K. Hamilton are held up as examples of how NOT to deal with the critics.
This incident, to me, is reminiscent of the sort of outbursts Rice would have when she got a 1-star rating on Amazon or whatever.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 01:35 am (UTC)(link)I wonder if agents shouldn't include a spiel about social media in their contracts? Because while I hate to be the "everyone turns evil online" person, since I think that tends to be exaggerated, I DO think that people react impulsively and forget that what happens online will impact how people see you in the "real" world. Unless of course you're anonymous, but a writer won't be, and I get that. But then watch what you say. You know? It really shouldn't be rocket science.
I know sometimes what I do is type up what I want to say, then wait until the anger cools off. Then I go back and decide whether or not it's really a good idea to post. 9/10? Nope. Not a good idea.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:47 am (UTC)(link)I'm definitely more a fan of the earlier episodes as well. They felt more like an actual news radio show. I stopped listening when the StrexCorp plot completely took over.
I had no idea the creators were like this until somebody linked to that tweet on tumblr. It's disappointing, but at times like this I'm very glad I'm capable of enjoying art as separate from the people who make it.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
Thank you for actually linking to the post in question though, I hadn't seen it since all that was going around Tumblr was Fink's tweet.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:53 am (UTC)(link)You're welcome.
The post itself is far from a shining exemplar of brilliant literary criticism (and as I said, I strongly disagree with much of it), but I do wish people would actually bother to read it before forming an opinion based solely on a tweet made in response to it.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
Fink acting like that makes me a different kind of sad.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:46 am (UTC)(link)Either give us context or fuck off.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:51 am (UTC)(link)I think with some things it is best to let people check it out for themselves and draw their own conclusions.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 03:25 am (UTC)(link)It won't hurt you to give one line as to the content of the link. It's not about letting people drawing their conclusions, it's about saying what's in the link to garner interest.
Until then, fuck off.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 04:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 05:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 12:53 am (UTC)(link)What you seem to want is cliff notes.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 03:27 am (UTC)(link)Until then, no viewing of link and no opinion because the topic could range anywhere from the ideal position of fucking tomatoes to someones beginning career in snail breeding.
Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 04:22 am (UTC)(link)Keep in mind someone could lie to you about what a link is, so "it could be a virus or NSFW or something I'm not interested in" doesn't count.
DA
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 04:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 05:05 am (UTC)(link)you're just looking fr something to bitch about.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2015-11-28 06:12 am (UTC)(link)My point stands though. How much more effort would it have been to just put "Nightvale novel wank" or "Authors behaving badly" in the damn subject line rather than the vague-as-shit one that was used?