[ SECRET POST #3250 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[rhett and link]


__________________________________________________



02. http://i.imgur.com/HFa7mmA.gif
[moving gif]


__________________________________________________



03. http://i.imgur.com/GzJRfyl.gif
[moving gif]


__________________________________________________



04. http://i.imgur.com/cCPmEkC.jpg
[linked for porn / het / illustrated]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Re: Battlestar Galactica Finale]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games /Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Hunger Games/Mockingjay]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Jessica Jones]



__________________________________________________



12. [tb2]


__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for rape]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for rape]




__________________________________________________



16. [WARNING for mentions of terror attacks]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #464.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

The issue is that you don't take the time to summarise what you're linking to. Not even a one liner.

Either give us context or fuck off.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I think with some things it is best to let people check it out for themselves and draw their own conclusions.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

Or, you can give us some context. All I can get about the html is that it is about a novel.

It won't hurt you to give one line as to the content of the link. It's not about letting people drawing their conclusions, it's about saying what's in the link to garner interest.

Until then, fuck off.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

You sure are angry about someone not making something interesting enough for you.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

would you like some cheese with that whine?

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

I should think a link to the whole thread is plenty of context.

What you seem to want is cliff notes.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

No, I want anon to stop being a lazy fuck and give us a line or two about what the link is about. Even a general theme.

Until then, no viewing of link and no opinion because the topic could range anywhere from the ideal position of fucking tomatoes to someones beginning career in snail breeding.

Re: Some potentially wanky fandom crap.

[(Anonymous)]

What bad things will happen to you if you visit a link without knowing what it is?

Keep in mind someone could lie to you about what a link is, so "it could be a virus or NSFW or something I'm not interested in" doesn't count.

DA

[(Anonymous)]

Just a single line about what fandom it is would be useful. If it's something I'm into, I can click the link. If not, I can pass it by. I shouldn't have to click the link to find out whether I'd actually be interested.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

if you'd actually bothered to look at the links, you'd notice that one has nightvale and novel right there in the url.

you're just looking fr something to bitch about.

Re: DA

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, my bad, I didn't notice that particular character string at the beginning of the URL; I expected relevant info at the end and just glanced at the rest.

My point stands though. How much more effort would it have been to just put "Nightvale novel wank" or "Authors behaving badly" in the damn subject line rather than the vague-as-shit one that was used?