[ SECRET POST #3253 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3253 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Fallout]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Colonel Fitzwilliam, Pride and Prejudice 1995 miniseries]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Master and Commander/Aubrey/Maturin series]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Undertale]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Justified]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Fury, Don/Boyd]


__________________________________________________



08.
(The Pioneer Woman/Ree Drummond)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Interworld]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #465.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

That's not how it's actually going down, don't be disingenuous.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

So how is it going down? Deets?

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Stoya posted a comment on twitter about how he raped her with literally no proof.

The friend then said she knew that Stoya was lying but "Everyone asking for my head: It is more important for society to believe women and sex workers than it is for me to defend one friend."

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Yikes.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

what kind of proof could Stoya possibly have given

especially since the specific scenario mentioned was that she tried to safe word out and he kept fucking her

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah like... I don't really have a stance, but idk what kind of evidence Stoya could have presented? I also don't know how this other lady could know FOR SURE he never ignored her safeword. What kind of proof COULD be presented either way?

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

"proof"

????????

What the hell "proof" are you supposed to have? How do you prove you've been raped if you've been kept silent on it for as long as she has?

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Well then that's too bad for her but like in any other case, it's "innocent until proven guilty" and if you have no physical proof, it's word against word and there is no basis to believe one over the other.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

Innocent before proven guilty is purely a legal standard. Also "not guilty" is different from "innocent".

Second I agree it is wise not to treat any conclusions as definite. But we don't just have their words - we have our reason and judgment and experience.

Third even on the most restrictive argument you're still a very long way from saying it definitely didn't happen.

Re: James Deen

[(Anonymous)]

It is a little bit though?
https://imgur.com/a/5qUCe