Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-03 06:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #3256 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3256 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Man From U.N.C.L.E.]
__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

[Ace Attorney]
__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 010 secrets from Secret Submission Post #465.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: controversial/confrontational/hostile/bitter opinions
Rape shield laws came about in the 70s and 80s across most states, where a victim's sexual history cannot be brought up in trial. This was a HUGE factor in bias in juries - they were finding defendants not guilty because the victim was known to be "loose" or "slutty", even if there was clear evidence of guilt.
2. The immorality would be far greater in not defending those accused of rape. I would (and regularly am) appalled by any rapist set free, but if a police officer violates that rapist's constitutional rights, there should be consequences or it opens every suspect and defendant to constitutional abuse. That is first and foremost what defense attorneys are for - to ensure a fair trial and to hold the state accountable for its actions. Otherwise, the state (i.e. the cops and DAs) could do whatever they damn well pleased to get a conviction. This standard must be held across the board - from petty theft to rape to capital murder to a parking ticket - because if it erodes in one area, it will erode in all. And what about those few that have been falsely accused? Think of the Scottsboro Boys or the Duke lacrosse team - extreme examples (especially since false allegations are by far the minority), but in one case, the defense attorneys saved those boys, and in the other, their poor defense condemned them.
Honestly, every single trial I've been in has been a game of emotions, and I mean Every. Single. One. And that's on both sides. Every person in that courtroom brings biases and prejudices to the trial, and there's no ignoring that. But the culture is changing and mostly for the better. Rape will always be a tricky crime to prosecute, of course. It's often "he said/she said", instead of, say, being able to point to a house that's been burglarized that everyone can see with a glance has been burglarized. That will lend itself more easily to having the jury fall back on their feelings and biases, and that's not good. But what has to change is how people think about rape, and that is happening.