[ SECRET POST #3259 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3259 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Technically, Disney can't promote a property that it doesn't own, so I don't quite understand the issue...

Is it that Marvel is allowing the Disney properties to be more visible? This is probably because Disney has the money to promote what it owns. That would be my guess anyway.

[(Anonymous)]

Marvel does have a choice in building up the comic storylines of characters whose movie rights are owned by Sony or Fox, but even if they choose to cut/diminish those characters in ongoing comics, it's not like those other movie studios can't draw on previous years' worth of stories or make up their own shit.