[ SECRET POST #3260 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3260 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Garden of Time]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fargo, Karl x Sonny]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Elementary]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Top Chef]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Pacific/HBO War]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Penn Jillette]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Final Fantasy X]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Shadow of Mordor]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Judging Amy]


__________________________________________________


11.
[The Lion Guard]


__________________________________________________



12.
(Borderlands)


__________________________________________________



13.
[Anziz Ansari, Master of None]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Samurai Warriors Chronicles 3/Pokémon Conquest/Japanese history]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: AO3 Tagging

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, it is a problem. But I feel the authors, too, because I've had ppl complain about the inclusion of some ship they hated, even though it was in the background, because I didn't tag for it.

I feel like writers can't win with tags. Someone is always unsatisfied with how it's done.

Re: AO3 Tagging

[philstar22]

I usually add minor pairings to the other tags rather than the relationship tag section.

Re: AO3 Tagging

[(Anonymous)]

Ooo, that's an idea I'll have to try, thanks.

Re: AO3 Tagging

[(Anonymous)]

That means people looking for main pairing results are going to be getting bogged down with your in-the-background-pairing tags getting thrown up though. If I want Janet and John as a pairing, then I'd rather not have to scroll through page after page of Malcolm and McDowell fics with Janet and John still tagged but as background. Please tag responsibly.

Re: AO3 Tagging

[(Anonymous)]

Idk because I've never posted anything on AO3, but as an author isn't it possible to just use the ship tags (e.g. main F/F-ship, very background M/M-ship) with having the category tag say both F/F and M/M, instead of just F/F? Because if all ships are included in the tags people shouldn't be too surprised/have no right to complain, even if the category doesn't reflect that both F/F and (very briefly) M/M ships appear.

Re: AO3 Tagging

[(Anonymous)]

It's not that it was m/m or f/f, it was that they hated that specific ship.