Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-08 06:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #3261 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3261 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I like the first movie the best, but even it has some faults. I could have done without Tauriel and with far less Legolas (I don't mind him being there, but I feel he stole too much screentime) and absolutely no Alfrid. If they were going to have an annoying money-grubbing human, couldn't they have left that role to the Master of Laketown, who had it originally? I'm sure Steven Fry would have done it well.
But yes, they are not spectacular adaptions, they don't stand up to LotR (and Fandom knows people have nitpicked those movies to the Void and back), but I am still glad they happened because they made me care about Dwarves in a way that Gimli failed.