[ SECRET POST #3262 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3262 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Yogscast: Hannah Rutherford and Lewis Brindley]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[El Goonish Shive]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
[Evita]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Blair Witch Project]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.
(Kirsten Dunst as Peggy Blumquist in Fargo)


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 035 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

NS, NF, etc.

[ 1 - not!secrets ] [ 1 - repeat ]

N!S

[kallanda_lee]

I don't think it's bad, I think many people just oppose going back and changing an (older) work of art, it's just that not everyone sees movies as a work of art.

I mean, it's sort of like if the Beatles would decide to change lyrics o some of their songs 30 years after they were released, or that Picasso would redo famous paintings at the end of his life.

People who love the original are going to have strong feelings about that

Re: N!S

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah but...Picasso was the sole creator of his works. Nobody was awarded for helping the Beatles write their lyrics. A lot of groundbreaking work went into Star Wars that Lucas couldn't have possibly done on his own but he was more than happy to get new people to shit on it later because of his own sad inability to see the work as complete. I'm not sure that that's where people are coming from in their hatred, but that's the part that really bothers me.

Anyway, probably most people are a lot less bothered by some changes than others, but you'd never know with SW fandom's extreme negativity olympics.

[(Anonymous)]

Or perhaps it's a matter of personal preference.

[ketita]

Huh, I didn't even know this had happened O_o all my Star Wars editions are from before that, apparently.

Do you really think *that* is the part people are really upset about?

[(Anonymous)]

Because I'm pretty sure it's the substituting in of young Anakin.

Re: Do you really think *that* is the part people are really upset about?

[(Anonymous)]

Came here to say the same.

Re: Do you really think *that* is the part people are really upset about?

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed

Re: Do you really think *that* is the part people are really upset about?

[(Anonymous)]

OP

I realize that other things upset people more. I actually think the young Anakin addition was stupid unless they also put in the young Obi-Wan.

But there are a lot of people who just say all the Special additions were bad or unnecessary. And this is one example where that isn't true.