[ SECRET POST #3263 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3263 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

But...

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think there ever was a time period when people dressed like that pic, though. Women wore corsets, but underneath other layers of clothing and not as a top all on its own, and elbow length evening gloves were for formal evening wear and wouldn't have been everyday accessories anyway. It was also rare for women to carry canes as a fashion statement rather than, well, a mark of physical infirmity. If you'd transported that lady in the secret back to say, Edwardian or Victorian times, people would assume she was a rather bold prostitute for the way she was dressed.

Now, if being a Victorian-era sex worker is what you want, far be it for me to stop you, but I don't think it sounds like a nice life.

Re: But...

[(Anonymous)]

I was thinking the same thing. I'm no expert on Victorian fashion, but what people point to as "Sexy Victorian" is not at all what you see in period photos, fashion plates, advertizements, etc., certainly not for everyday wear. Evening clothes allowed decolletage, but during the day you couldn't dress like in the photo.

Re: But...

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah. Victorian clothing meant a lot more layers than people nowadays are accustomed to wearing. In reality, you'd feel like a wool-clad sausage and your clothes would probably be pretty whiffy since not all of it can be easily laundered.

Re: But...

[dreemyweird]

ilu, nerdy anon.

Re: But...

[(Anonymous)]

So what you're saying is, this is actually modern fashion and not out of date by over a century?