[ SECRET POST #3263 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3263 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #466.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Would you rather...

[(Anonymous)]

What about the second option suggests it would hurt their mental wellbeing or the relationship, though? Like, all it says is they find you hot but sex between you is impossible. That's not unhealthy. Lots of people are in relationships where they can't have sex.

Nor is it stroking one's own ego to want a relationship where you're desired. Personally the first one sounds pretty awful to me. Like, you can fuck them but it's not something they're ever going to want, nor do they actually find you sexually desirable? No thanks.

Re: Would you rather...

[dreemyweird]

It says that they would enjoy the sex, though. It wouldn't be, like, rape. You'd both have a fun time. I think that's massively better than both of you being sexually frustrated forever.

The worst part about the second one is that it sounds like the other person is doomed to always want sex with you and never have it. "Incredibly sexually attractive". Why would anyone want to inflict that on themselves and their partner unless it's to alleviate their shallow self-esteem issues? Of course, it IS possible to have a relationship where you're both very much sexually attracted to one another but unable to have sex for e.g. medical reasons, but I believe this does require some work.

Re: Would you rather...

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt
I wouldn't enjoy the sex though. Having sex with someone who's not sexually attracted to me is not something I would ever do willingly. We're people, not sex toys. Emotions, even sexual ones, aren't something I'm willing to toss aside.

I've gotten by without sex for years at a time. I could certainly handle that if my partner were unable. At least with the second option we'd be on equal footing in terms of our desires and needs. We'd be dealing with the issues together.

Re: Would you rather...

[diet_poison]

I wouldn't enjoy the sex though. Having sex with someone who's not sexually attracted to me is not something I would ever do willingly.

+1000