case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-12-12 04:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #3265 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3265 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [nf]


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________


12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2- not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-12-12 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
It depends on the relativist, I suppose.

(Anonymous) 2015-12-12 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, fair enough, I suppose.

I guess my broader argument is that it's hard for me to see any possible source of value that doesn't fall into one of the two categories that ill_omened laid out. Either the value is founded on something with the status of moral truth, or it's going to fall into something indistinguishable from nihilism.

In particular, I would argue that "some people just happen to value some things and it's a matter of preference" is going to be indistinguishable from nihilism if you follow the logic.