[ SECRET POST #3265 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3265 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [nf]


__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________


12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #467.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2- not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[blitzwing]

That's funny. Absolute morality is usually the most feels-based morality there is--if it's not your feels, it's "I'm following God's feels!".

[(Anonymous)]

Stop trying to bring logic into this discussion. Logic has no place on F!S.

[(Anonymous)]

This is not logic.

Normative moral relativism as this person is trying to seel it, is not even a widely accepted concept, ask any philosopher.

[(Anonymous)]

*sell it

[ill_omened]

Even if we grant you that (and it's been half a decade since I've formally studied philosophy; so I could hardly mount the most compelling defence without refreshing myself).

That still doesn't make an argument for moral relativism, merely nihilism, as I highlighted.

[(Anonymous)]

You're assuming there's only absolute morality and relative morality, and that moral relativism is an unquestionable theory... are you even trying?

http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/value/relativism.php