Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-12-26 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #3279 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3279 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #469.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA
(Anonymous) 2015-12-26 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)If someone interprets a person taking down their own fic as "OMG CENSORSHIP THAT MUST BE FOUGHT AGAINST" then they're an entitled idiot.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2015-12-26 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2015-12-26 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2015-12-27 09:57 am (UTC)(link)The internet routes around censorship (meaning, in this case, the removal of information) the way water seeks its own level. You might not like that water does that. You might think it has bad consequences. You might even be right. You can King Canute this all you want, but it will not change what the water does.
It may be good or bad, right or wrong, that the internet routes around censorship in any particular case. None of that is relevant. It's a structural fact. Information wants to be free as a structural property of information.