case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-01 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #3285 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3285 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Big Bang Theory]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]



__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for The Force Awakens]



__________________________________________________



14. [SPOILERS for Kimi to Kanojo to Kanojo no Koi]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for sexual assault/rape]

[Game of Thrones]






























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #469.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
Why is it only a valid argument when you benefit from it?

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
That is my question, yes. Please answer.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
And I'm answering with the same question. I'll answer when you do.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
I do not know why you think the system only works in your favor, therefore I cannot answer the question. Which is why I asked why you think that only you are entitled to special consideration.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
I don't. I'm just pointing out how fucking stupid your argument is.

Your move.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
See, now you're mistaken, because my point makes sense and you are making none. We can continue this conversation after you work on your reading comprehension. Until then, I have nothing more to say to you.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Ah yes, the "you don't agree with me because you didn't understand my point" defense. More proof you know your argument is fucking dumb.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
DA

My favorite part of this is how you keep proving the point of the person you're arguing with, and you don't even care.

Re: Pet Peeves thread

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
What point? Because they don't have one.

NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, your whole 'point' has been "I'm allowed to do whatever I want because the internet and no apparent consequences and everyone else is stupid and wrong for not being cool with it"

The things other people say aren't wrong because you want them to be or you say they are.

Your attempts at arguing are the debate equivalent of really bad smoke and mirror tricks. Like a stage magician sneaking off stage saying "you don't see me, you don't see me, i'm invisible"

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) 2016-01-02 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
And again, this argument is only valid when it benefits you, for some reason. And when this is pointed out to you, you respond with "I'm right but you're just too dumb to get it."