Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-04 07:16 pm
[ SECRET POST #3288 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3288 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:34 am (UTC)(link)I'll be the first to admit that people do it in stupid ways sometimes, but that's people.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:51 am (UTC)(link)And again - who decided that these communities were going to focus on only engaging in the precise way that you like? Who made you the president here?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:53 am (UTC)(link)And again - who decided that these communities were going to focus on only engaging in the precise way that you like? Who made you the president here?
The community members who want to talk about the source material in peace without listening to people grasping for shit to complain about.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:59 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 01:07 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 01:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:45 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 12:54 am (UTC)(link)Yes, those people are jerks. But often times if they are called on their behavior they have no idea they are being wet blankets. They genuinely think they are making positive contributions to the discussions.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-01-05 01:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject