[ SECRET POST #3290 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3290 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #470.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ketita]

Sadly, I think there are a lot of people who, while trying to identify some kind of fundamental external arbiter for why these kids "shouldn't" be having sex or whatever, grasp onto the age of consent as the absolute thing.
I have seen conversations about shipping which devolve into wank over the character being 16 and how that's the legal age of consent in X country, when that's really not what the conversation should be about at all. It obscures the issue.

[(Anonymous)]

I feel like teenagers having sex with each other and teens enjoying media about teens being sexual is very different from media about sexualized teens aimed at an older audience, though.

It's like... the difference between Skins and early Britney Spears. One is about and for teens, one is selling teen sexuality to a broader audience.