case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-13 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #3297 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3297 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #471.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe trying to say that the "futa" aren't transwomen, and someone who is into futa wouldn't be willing to date an actual transwoman?

Or possibly someone being rude, from the wording.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
The thing that's weird to me about it is that it seems like it's placing the (intensely fetishized pornographic) category of 'futa' as more important & better than the (actually lived experience and real thing) category of 'transwoman'.

fucking weird as shit

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
IDK, don't most futas also have a vagina under their penis? Or the clit becomes a penis? Futa aren't transwoman....

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
I know

the thing that was weird to me was that the comment read (to me) like "You wish you were a futa, but in fact you are just a [bad, inferior] transwoman". That's what bothered me. Because that seems like a fucked up and wrong attitude.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
I read it as 'in real life most people are weirded out by transwoman'.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
that would still be a kind of fucked up response to op's comment, tbh

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
But it's true.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
2D fetishes =/= 3D fetishes


This is like Fandom 101

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
and my point is that real, actually existing people are more important than 2d fetishes

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Nah

hope that helps nonny

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Ethically, yes, of course, but that doesn't change people's likes and dislikes. You can't demand people develop an interest in dating real transwomen just because they have certain fetishes in fiction because no one can just change what they like that way.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
That's not what I'm saying

I'm saying that it's fucked up to say "you wish you were a futa"

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
na

Why?

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I guess it's not wrong in itself, if someone really does want it, but saying it in this context is, because it implies that the highest thing the OP could hope to want to be is this specific fetish-desire-object.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-14 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
because it's insulting you fucking idiot