fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #3307 ]

⌈ Secret Post #3307 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Then make a statistical case using unbiased, reliable statistics.

I think it is pretty hard to make that case, but I'm open to hearing your argument.

Statistic based on what, precisely? Surely you're already aware that social issues are notoriously difficult to represent statistically. Let alone that an issue like this would require extensive documentation to even produce a pattern.

As for the issue of street and sexual harrassment in other cultures, well if hundreds of women talking about it and trying to raise awareness - especially in Egypt - is not enough for you then you're a lost cause.

People en masse do not follow the rules of logic. The time for analysis will come. That time is not now. Quick, clear action is needed to stop this becoming a social nightmare for all involved.

Unfortunately for people like you who have no way of understanding humanity without a large dataset and an R analysis in front of them, that will not involve a clearly stated logical dataset. It will involve a push to integrate people.

The problem is that, when the only tool you have for thinking through a phenomenon is instinct, there's a huge danger of one's biases and prejudices shining through. That's why statistics are valuable - they provide an external guy-line to hold ourselves by to avoid getting carried away. If there isn't any evidence then we have to be careful and take note of our uncertainties and of the ambiguities and lack of clarity that beset us.

I agree that quick, clear action is needed in these situations. I think that the bases of action that you're encouraging will lead to that action being done in ways that's harmful and racist. Of course there should be a push for integration and acclimation. But how that's carried out is very different depending on how you frame the problem. In other words - I agree that quick action is needed, but I'm not sure it should be carried out under the assumption that immigrant men are slavering rapists just waiting to attack women.

C'est la vie. In these situations, historical example and an understanding of humanity is the only sensible basis for decision making, not instinct - which you seem to think is the only alternative to statistics-based decision making.

In these situations, solid evidence in the way you mean it isn't avaialble for a long, long time, long after all is said and done. Partial evidence maybe. But that still has to be patched together by somebody who understands humanity.

"I'm not sure it should be carried out under the assumption that immigrant men are slavering rapists just waiting to attack women. "

Not once have I said that they are. What I have said is that there is a cultural clash here, and that there is extensive documentation online that sexual harrassment and street harrassment are extensive problems in many of the countries of migrants origins.

This has now extended to Europe - correlated to migrants and evidenced in emerging sexual harrassment crime statistics. Clearly there is a problem here and it needs dealing with. Quickly.

+10000 to everything you're saying in this thread. So much of the problem here seems to be that instead of paying attention to what you're actually saying, the person/people you're arguing with are only hearing their own presumption of what you really mean. And there's a kind of paranoia at work that causes people to presume that what you really mean is the worst possible thing they've heard anyone say that sounds remotely similar to what you're actually saying.

So "there is a cultural clash here, and that there is extensive documentation online that sexual harrassment and street harrassment are extensive problems in many of the countries of migrants origins" becomes "immigrant men are slavering rapists just waiting to attack women."

You're seeing the shades of grey, and attempting to navigate them, while others are defaulting almost instantaneously to a need for black and white. The thing I've been struggling to understand is why this is happening. Is everyone so terrified of being thought racist that they won't even look directly at the issue?

"Is everyone so terrified of being thought racist that they won't even look directly at the issue? "

Yes.

Is everyone so terrified of being thought racist that they won't even look directly at the issue?

I think yes. Weren't there news reports that the police initially suppressed the reports because they didn't want to fan anti-immigrant sentiment?

more like the only people who ever bring up this argument are looking for thinly-veiled excuses for their already racist beliefs

[ SECRET POST #3307 ]

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant

Re: EU Migrant Crisis Rant