case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-01-24 03:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #3308 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3308 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Quandary

(Anonymous) 2016-01-25 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Blitzwing has a good point that he'll probably end up killing the dog through neglect or abuse and he'd be no better off than if the dog was taken away (but the dog clearly would be worse off).

Plus, if authorities confiscate it, it might be a learning opportunity for him - they can tell him what he's doing wrong - and there's a chance he will either not get another dog or will take better care of any future dogs. Maybe he won't really understand, but he might. On the other hand, if the dog starves to death or dies of internal bleeding from being kicked, it's likely there will be no one to tell him it was his fault and he might just repeat the process with another dog.