Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-01-25 06:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #3309 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3309 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #473.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: TW: Rape mention
Re: TW: Rape mention
(Anonymous) 2016-01-26 05:36 am (UTC)(link)Is it because you're non-binary and you interacted with a lot of those idiot TERFs?
Re: TW: Rape mention
Pretty much every feminist group I've been around in the last decade. I was a SJ/feminist blogger though, so I was probably more deeply immersed in the SJ/feminist scene than many feminists.
Is it because you're non-binary and you interacted with a lot of those idiot TERFs?
No, I've barely interacted with TERFs, if anything. That's the good thing about being a member of a fundamentalist sect (in this case, modern feminists), they protect you from those with opposing views that contradict doctrine. And by "protect" I mean threaten to shun you if you have any sort of polite relationship with members of the enemy out-group.
Not that I feel like I've missed anything by being kept from the TERFs.
Re: TW: Rape mention
(Anonymous) 2016-01-26 06:50 am (UTC)(link)My experience has been completely different. Maybe because I hang around with people similar in beliefs to myself but all the feminists I know are actively against the more egregious forms of sexism (including issues which only affect men) and extremely vocal in their disagreements with TERFs and other people who try to legitimise bigotry using feminist rhetoric they either don't understand or are wilfully misinterpreting for their own ends. They all think shirtgate and manspreading is nonsense that detracts from actual issues. And they often criticise feminist theory and disagree even with each other about interpretations of certain ones.
I totally get how the worst of the movement drives people away, though. Hell, I'm a feminist bisexual sex worker so I've had other feminists actively tell me I can't be one because of that. I've also had antifeminists tell me I can't be one because I don't fit in with the ugly manhating stereotype. O_o
Your Christian analogy kind of falls flat with me. I'm not American. The majority of Catholics in my country voted to legalise gay marriage and our equivalent of Plan B has been legal and free to anyone who asks for it since the 80s. You've been exposed to the worst of the worst and your beliefs reflect that experience. I've been exposed to people who use their political beliefs to make the world better and mine reflects that.
Re: TW: Rape mention
(Anonymous) 2016-01-26 07:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: TW: Rape mention
Yeah, I'm largely avoiding adopting any social group identities unless truly necessary. I believe that such identities, while they have their uses, contribute to the things like I mentioned above, like out-group-homogeneity-bias. They often feed generalizations and stereotyping, which in turn feed oppression and hate.
I am glad you have found some fellow feminists that are critical and think for themselves. I have some feminist friends that are so as well (they are an extreme minority of my experience with feminists though).
Your Christian analogy kind of falls flat with me.
I thought it might be so, which is why I wiped it at the last moment. I'm sorry for having you read such a long-winded ramble, when it wasn't even informative.
Re: TW: Rape mention
(Anonymous) 2016-01-26 07:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: TW: Rape mention
(Anonymous) 2016-01-26 07:35 am (UTC)(link)I kind of want to apologize to you, 'cause while it's only been once or twice, I've engaged you on your anti-feminist views before, and in very knee-jerk ways. I didn't think to listen to your side of the story, and now having read it, I think I get where you're coming from. What you're exposed to is obviously going to form your opinions, and your experiences have been overwhelmingly negative.
I do hope you continue to meet critical, self-thinking feminists, and less 'toe-the-party-line' feminists. Even if you choose not to take on the label again, it'd be a good thing.